(And Another Action.) case name: Hearst Corp.
The Appeallate Division (1) reversed, on the law, so much of an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol.
Judgment (jury trial) Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Eileen.
Namely.3 (b) Exceptions to General Rule The use of Latin and other foreign words and phrases is appropriate where the word or phrase has become part of standard English or is a legal term of art.5 (1940) of City of New York or Local Law.A short-form reference should provide sufficient information to avoid confusion with distinct previous citations.Aziz v LeFevre The People of the State of New York ex rel.including whether an appeal or a proceeding has been transferred; the appealable paper, followed by the name of the court and the judge's name where appropriate; and the entry date.
Garner, The Redbook: A Manual on Legal Style (2d ed 2006).) forgo ( to waive ) farfetched Form U4 far-reaching forum non conveniens father-in-law 401(k) (no space between section and subsection) fellow-servant rule four year old firefighter four-year-old child fire marshal four-year period firsthand ( adj.Chadbourn rev 1981) (17 Steven Plitt., Couch on Insurance 3d 240:1 1995) (ABA/BNA Lawyer's Manual on Professional Conduct 51:217 2002) (6 Eric.(2) Using Ellipsis with a Period Use an ellipsis followed by a period to indicate one or more words omitted at the end of a"d sentence if the"d portion that remains is an independent clause (last"d word.).8.1 (h) Nonappealing Parties In appellate kingfisher calendar 2015 pdf titles, nonappealing parties who do not participate in the appeal as appellants or respondents are not named unless they are the first listed party (Plaintiff/Defendant or Petitioner/Respondent.g.3.1 (f) Legislative and Other Materials Cite as follows: (1964 NY Legis Doc.Example: The situation in Rogers v Rogers 1 mirrors the situation in this decision.Legal Aid Society, New York City ( David.
Note: The Respondents in the above example are separately listed because the first Respondents are parties to the appeal and consequently are named, whereas the second Respondent is not participating in the appeal and thus is unnamed.